adtestbench

AI news · Google · Gemini

Google staff doubt Gemini 4 on real coding work, Bloomberg says

Employees say the new model shines on benchmarks but stumbles on front-end code, on the day of its release; Google calls that inaccurate.

By Alexandre S. , 01:30 UTC

Some Google employees doubt that Gemini 4 matches its benchmark scores on real coding work, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday 30 September 2026, the day Google released Gemini 4 Argon. Staff told the outlet the model struggles most with front-end design.

Retro-futurist illustration: a striped sunset over a grid horizon under a starry sky, with a microchip standing on the horizon.
Drawn by adtestbench from Google Grapples With Employee Skepticism About New Gemini Model,

Opinion inside the company is split. Some employees think Anthropic’s and OpenAI’s newest models are improving faster, while others say Gemini 4 has caught up. Google had already dropped a planned Gemini 3.5 Pro release in June. A spokesperson said it would be inaccurate to describe Gemini 4 as underperforming in coding, and DeepMind’s Koray Kavukcuoglu told Bloomberg he is certain Google stays at the frontier.

Investors noticed. Alphabet shares, up more than 2% earlier in the session, were up only about 0.5% heading into the close after the report, Investing.com reports. Gemini models sit behind Search, Maps, Gmail and Chrome, products that each serve more than a billion users, the same report notes.

Google released Argon to cyber defenders first, as we reported on 1 October.

For teams choosing a coding model, the report is a reason to judge Gemini 4 on their own repositories. Google’s own staff say leaderboard scores miss front-end work.

Earlier on this story: Google releases Gemini 4 Argon to cyber defenders first