adtestbench

AI news · OpenAI · policy

Altman says OpenAI and Anthropic still split on AI rules

In Politico’s new Decoded newsletter, OpenAI’s chief argues that wide access to AI is worth some harm along the way.

By Alexandre S. , 05:30 UTC

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman says his company and Anthropic still differ on how hard AI should be regulated. He made the case in an interview for the debut Monday edition of Politico’s Decoded, released on Sunday 4 October 2026 by Business Insider, Politico’s sister title.

Retro-futurist illustration: a striped sunset over a grid horizon under a starry sky, with a ringed globe standing on the horizon.
Drawn by adtestbench from “Sam Altman said 'the world should accept some bad things happening' for the benefits of AI”,

Asked where he parts ways with Anthropic and its chief Dario Amodei, Altman said the world should “accept some bad things happening” in return for the benefits and for people’s agency. He rejected the idea of one San Francisco lab holding the most powerful systems and handing out the gains, and said he would not swap broad access for a promise of zero hacks or scams. His limit is the catastrophic end of the scale, including AI slipping out of human control.

The distance between the two labs has shrunk. SiliconANGLE notes that Altman backed Amodei’s call last month to slow frontier development. Business Insider adds that OpenAI now endorses stricter state safety laws and a bipartisan House bill that would put outside safety evaluators inside the top AI companies, shifts that followed a run of hacking incidents by OpenAI’s agents.

For teams that buy from both labs, the interview spells out the remaining difference: OpenAI argues for wide access with some harm accepted, and Anthropic, in Altman’s account, for tighter control of the most capable systems.